Choosing a handgun, especially for concealed carry, is a deeply personal decision. Two popular contenders frequently top the list: the Glock 19 and the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact. Both are reliable, accurate pistols, but their differences can significantly impact your choice. This in-depth comparison will help you decide which pistol best fits your needs and shooting style.
Key Differences: Size, Weight, and Feel
While both are compact 9mm handguns suitable for concealed carry, subtle differences exist:
-
Size and Weight: The Glock 19 is slightly smaller and lighter than the M&P 2.0 Compact, making it potentially easier to conceal for some individuals. However, the weight difference is minimal and might not be a deciding factor for everyone. The perceived difference in size and weight often comes down to individual hand size and grip preference.
-
Grip Texture: The Glock 19 features a noticeably more aggressive grip texture than the M&P 2.0 Compact. This can provide a more secure grip, particularly in wet or stressful situations, but some find it too abrasive. The M&P 2.0 Compact offers a more moderate texture, which some shooters prefer for comfort during extended practice sessions.
-
Ergonomics: The M&P 2.0 Compact boasts a more ergonomic design, with a slightly curved backstrap that conforms better to the hand for many users. This results in a more natural point of aim and improved comfort, particularly during prolonged shooting sessions. The Glock 19's straight grip angle is appreciated by some, but others find it less comfortable.
Features and Functionality: A Side-by-Side Look
Let's delve into a feature comparison:
| Feature | Glock 19 | M&P 2.0 Compact |
|---|---|---|
| Action Type | Striker-fired | Striker-fired |
| Caliber | 9mm (most common) | 9mm (most common) |
| Capacity | 15 rounds (standard magazine) | 12 rounds (standard magazine) |
| Sights | Standard plastic sights | Adjustable sights (typically) |
| Safety | Trigger safety | Ambidextrous manual thumb safety |
| Trigger Pull | Known for a crisp, short break | Generally smoother, more manageable |
| Customization | Limited aftermarket options | Wide range of aftermarket options |
Performance and Reliability: On the Range
Both pistols are known for their exceptional reliability. Countless rounds have been fired through both models with minimal malfunctions. However, subtle differences in trigger pull and ergonomics might influence accuracy and speed.
-
Trigger: The Glock 19's trigger is often described as having a shorter, crisper break, while the M&P 2.0 Compact's trigger is often considered smoother, with less perceived "creep." Shooter preference varies significantly here.
-
Accuracy: Both pistols are capable of high accuracy, with performance largely dependent on the shooter's skill and ammunition used.
Concealed Carry Considerations: Which is Better?
For concealed carry, the Glock 19's slightly smaller size and lighter weight might make it slightly easier to conceal for some. However, the M&P 2.0 Compact's improved ergonomics might offer a more comfortable carry experience for others. The better choice depends on individual body type and clothing preferences. Consider trying both pistols holstered to assess your comfort level.
The Verdict: It Depends on Your Needs
Ultimately, the "better" pistol depends entirely on individual preferences and priorities. The Glock 19 excels in simplicity, reliability, and ease of maintenance, while the M&P 2.0 Compact offers superior ergonomics and a more customizable experience. Rent or borrow both pistols before making a purchase to determine which one feels best in your hand and best suits your needs. This hands-on approach is crucial for making an informed decision.
