The Ruger 57 and the FN 57 are two pistols that immediately grab attention due to their unique caliber: 5.7x28mm. While sharing this unusual cartridge, these handguns offer distinct features and shooting experiences. This in-depth comparison will delve into their strengths and weaknesses, helping you decide which pistol best suits your needs and preferences.
Caliber Considerations: The Heart of the Matter
Both firearms utilize the 5.7x28mm cartridge, known for its high velocity and flatter trajectory compared to traditional handgun rounds. This cartridge excels at longer ranges than most pistol calibers, and its smaller size allows for higher magazine capacity. However, it’s crucial to understand that the 5.7x28mm is not a universally accepted round, and ammunition availability and cost may be factors to consider. Some shooters find the recoil manageable, while others report a snappy feel. This is something to consider based on personal shooting experience.
Ruger 57: The Budget-Friendly Contender
The Ruger 57 is often praised for its affordability. It brings the 5.7x28mm experience to a more accessible price point compared to the FN 57. This makes it an attractive option for those wanting to explore this unique cartridge without a significant financial commitment.
Ruger 57 Pros:
- Price: Significantly more affordable than the FN 57.
- Capacity: Offers a generous magazine capacity, allowing for extended shooting sessions.
- Ergonomics: Generally considered comfortable to hold and shoot, even for extended periods.
- Reliability: Ruger's reputation for reliability generally holds true with the 5.7.
Ruger 57 Cons:
- Finish: Some users report issues with the finish durability over time.
- Trigger: The trigger pull can be a point of contention, with some finding it less refined than the FN 57's.
- Parts Availability: While Ruger generally has a good parts supply chain, the relative newness of the 5.7 platform might present some challenges.
FN 57: The Original and Refined
The FN 57 is the pioneer of the 5.7x28mm handgun platform. As the original, it often boasts a higher perceived quality and more refined features, though at a premium price.
FN 57 Pros:
- Refinement: Generally boasts a more refined finish, trigger, and overall feel.
- Accuracy: Known for its superior accuracy compared to the Ruger 57, particularly at longer ranges.
- Reputation: The established reputation of FN Herstal adds to the perceived value and reliability.
FN 57 Cons:
- Price: Substantially more expensive than the Ruger 57.
- Capacity: While still boasting a high capacity, it may not match the Ruger 57 in some magazine configurations.
- Availability: Availability can sometimes be affected depending on regional demand and distribution.
Beyond the Specs: Practical Considerations
Ultimately, the "better" pistol comes down to individual needs and preferences. Consider these factors:
- Budget: The Ruger 57 offers significant cost savings.
- Intended Use: Are you looking for a range gun, home defense weapon, or something else entirely? The 5.7x28mm's capabilities should align with your intended use.
- Shooting Experience: Consider your experience level. The snappy recoil of the 5.7x28mm may be more manageable for experienced shooters.
- Maintenance & Parts: Evaluate the long-term costs associated with maintenance and potential parts replacement.
Conclusion: Choosing Your Weapon
Both the Ruger 57 and the FN 57 offer compelling features in the unique 5.7x28mm caliber. The Ruger 57 presents a budget-friendly entry point, while the FN 57 provides a more refined and arguably higher-quality experience. Thoroughly research both pistols, handle them if possible, and choose the one that best fits your individual needs and shooting style. Remember, the best gun is the one you're most comfortable and confident shooting.
